In fact, Brooke died of a blood infection on his way to the Dardanelles before he had seen action. There is a light, flowing rhythm with repetition of England and focused on love for England. Throughout the first stanza of Dulce et Owen uses effective similes to portray a tone of dirty, grimy experiences the soldiers had to go through.
His poems of war reflect an attitude held by many early in the war, when thousands of young men rushed to enlist in the hope of winning glory for themselves and their country. The man who dies in service of his country may be forever "at peace, blest by an English heaven," the "richer dust" of England living, immortal, in the bodies of its soldiers, fallen in faraway lands.
War and death are the themes of both poems but they are written from different perspectives. There are several differences between Dulce et and The Soldier. Dulce et speaks about the bitter reality of war while The Soldier glorifies dying for your country.
That shows how the battle has severely damaged the spirits of the soldiers.
Owen was an active soldier who died in the trenches just a week before the war ended, having seen some of the thickest fighting of the war. Owen opposes to the idea of fighting in a war. I think Dulce et is better at conveying its message than The Soldier.
In the final stanza the perspective changes from 1st to 3rd person, I to You, and is the scene after the gas has gone and the man is dead.
Generally, one thinks of a soldier as a man full of strength, who looks brave with his uniform and marches confidently to war. If they die on foreign soil, that land will be forever part of England because their soul remains there along with their values and love for England.
While Dulce et coveys the horrific reality of war and convinces against dying for ones country, The Soldier stresses how it is an honour to die for ones country.
This draws you in with the graphic war scene. Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen were both English soldier poets of the First World War, but their poetic output was very different and reflected the chasm that separated them in terms of actual war experience.
The two poets take different approaches in portraying the effect that war has on the people involved. The Soldier uses simple language to appeal to numerous people, but Dulce et has more emotion and meaning and makes you think carefully about the horrors of war.
His language is vivid, deliberately unpleasant:“Compare and contrast “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke with “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen with regard to theme, tone, imagery, diction, metre, etc” The Soldier by Rupert Brooke, and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen are two poems which were written during the First World War, and both being written about this conflict, they share the same theme of war poetry.
Although 'The Soldier' by Rupert Brooke and 'Dulce et Decorum Est' by Wilfred Owen are concerned with the common theme of war, the two poems contrast two very different views of war.
View Essay - The Comparison and Contrast of Wilfred Owen and Rupert Brooke from ELA at Georgia Military College.
The Comparison and Contrast Dulce et Decorum est, by Wilfred Owen. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and contrasts of ‘The Soldier’ by Rupert Brooke and ‘Dulce et Decorum est’ Wilfred Owen specifically for you for only $ $ /page Order now.
Wilfred Owen uses language in Dulce Et Decorum Est to give the reader the impression that war is horrible and that dying for one's country is not all the glory and honour that it seems, and that in reality, dying in a war, no matter for what cause, can be both painful and full of suffering, while Rupert Brooke on the other hand, uses language in The Soldier, to give the reader the impression that dying in war for.
- Comparing The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen Two poems that contend with the subject of war are "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke and "Dulce et decorum Est" written by Wilfred Owen.
Both poets fought and died in the First World War.Download